Question 1
During the colonial era, both the British indirect rule in Northern Nigeria and the French policy of assimilation in Senegal were designed to govern through existing African institutions. Which of the following most accurately explains a key difference in how these two systems affected the status of traditional rulers?
- a.British indirect rule preserved the authority of local chiefs, while French assimilation tried to replace traditional rulers with appointed French officials.
- b.Both systems abolished traditional rulers, but only the British allowed chiefs to retain nominal titles.
- c.French assimilation strengthened the power of traditional rulers, whereas British indirect rule undermined them by introducing new taxes.
- d.British indirect rule required local chiefs to learn English, while French assimilation mandated that traditional rulers become citizens of France.
Solution
British indirect rule preserved and worked through existing chiefs to maintain local authority, while the French policy of assimilation attempted to erode traditional power by imposing French-appointed officials. Choice 1 is correct; choice 3 is tempting but inaccurate—the French generally reduced, not increased, traditional authority.
